Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S17

Taking Stock of Personalized Learning > www.edweek.org/go/personalized
EDUCATION WEEK OCTOBER 22, 2014 | S17
n
Challenges:
l
l
District has not yet defined how to continue its
personalized learning efforts once the grant period ends.
District is confident in the programs, but is looking for
data to confirm and establish a clear picture to make
a case for sustainability.
Future plans:
l
The school system's investments in the social and
emotional health of students will be critical to the
success of personalized learning.
l
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Miami, Fla.
Enrollment: 353,000
Racial/ethnic profile: 67 percent Hispanic,
23 percent African-American, 8 percent white,
2 percent other
Students qualifying for free and reduced-price
meals: 81 percent
RACE TO THE TOP AWARD: $30 MILLION
Personalized learning goals:
l Strengthen algebra at the high school level by building a
strong foundation of math at the middle school level.
l Focus on middle school mathematics so the lowestperforming
students are algebra-ready by high school,
and more-advanced students are ready to accelerate in
high school.
l Use a blended learning model to teach math.
l Add laptops, interactive whiteboards, and furniture that
encourages group collaboration and small-group work
with teachers.
l Focus on professional development and add a three-week
summer institute. Use math facilitators as support
specialists to do job-embedded professional development
at 49 schools.
l Increase the student-teacher ratio to 20-to-1 in targeted
classrooms, with three adults and 60 students in a room.
Technology-based approaches:
l Lenovo laptops for every student, two interactive
whiteboards in targeted classrooms.
l Students use Carnegie Learning's Mathia, a blended
learning curriculum, which also contains an adaptive
component aligned to the Common Core State Standards.
l Students may set up their own learning paths using
the Mathia software and progress when they have
demonstrated proficiency. Teachers use data collected
by the program to provide personalized instruction the
following day.
Measuring success:
l The budget includes funding for external evaluators to
assess the program.
l Two Carnegie project managers are assigned to work with
the 49 schools, to facilitate student-data analysis.
l Principals receive biweekly reports from Carnegie
detailing student usage.
l The end-of-the-year summative report for 2013-14 found
a positive correlation between more skills being mastered
in math, assessments scores, and the use of technology.
Challenges:
l Changing longtime teacher practices and mindsets.
l Technology glitches, including login issues.
l Last year, they introduced a new set of standards but
students were still being tested on old standards. This
was difficult for teachers.
Future Plans:
l The district hopes to continue with the iPrep Math and
expand into other subject areas. The results from next
few years will be critical in determining what actions they
take when the grant ends.
l
l
Harmony Public Schools
A district with charter schools across the state.
Grant applies to middle and high schools only.
Based in Houston
Enrollment: 28,500 (Middle and high school
enrollment is 14,600)
Racial/ethnic profile: 48 percent Hispanic,
19 percent African-American, 18 percent white,
14 percent Asian
Students qualifying for free and reduced-price
meals: 59 percent
RACE TO THE TOP AWARD: $30 MILLION
Personalized learning goals:
l Boost individual student support to master essential
skills and deepen content understanding.
l Increase proficiency in math and reading on summative
assessments.
l Decrease achievement gap between minority and lowincome
students and whites.
l Maintain a 100 percent high school graduation rate.
l Increase college matriculation rates and the number of
students interested in stem majors and career choices.
Technology-based approaches:
l Provide students with 1-to-1 device environments using
Chromebooks in grades 6-12. Allow schools to choose
between a take-home or in-school model for their Google
Chromebooks.
l Implement adaptive-learning software in math and
English/language arts. Students can work on individual
modules, and programs provide feedback to allow
teachers to personalize instruction.
l Students can use Chromebooks to work online on student
programs as well as access offline resources.
l Use digital learning tools that support mastery-based
instruction progression.
l Use a project-based learning approach in stem and other
core subjects.
l Make use of data systems and dashboards to provide
teachers, parents, and students with metrics and key
performance indicators to customize education.
Measuring success:
l Formative and summative data are collected from
assessments, learning software, students' project-based
learning products, and other student-created work.
l Student progress is tracked using personalized learning
plans, mastery reports, college- and career-readiness
indicators.
Positive outcomes:
l Initial results from 2013-14 show all grade levels
participating in Race to the Top programs have
improved their performance in both math and reading
assessments.
l Harmony has outperformed state averages for both
reading and math at each participating grade level in
middle and high school. Almost all high schools scored
90 percent or higher proficiency in biology end-of-course
assessments and 100 percent on physics end-of-course
assessments, attributed to a project-based learning
approach.
l There is increasing student demand for Advanced
Placement science courses, and more students are
choosing to study stem-related subjects in college.
Challenges:
l Identifying the best technology tools, getting teacher
and principal buy-in on every decision, communicating
strategies to stakeholders effectively, and recruiting
talent for some projects were among the district's general
challenges.
l It's been more difficult for some reading teachers to
adapt since the technology effect is not as strong as in
math, for example.
Future plans:
l Harmony's personalized education model is sustainable.
The district is building the human capacity to carry out
and sustain each of the projects beyond the grant years.
l District plans to pursue additional grants.
Measuring success:
l The district uses results from the California state test as
well as adaptive benchmark assessments such as the
Measures of Academic Success (map) test. The district
also uses surveys to track teacher use of technology.
No results from state testing are available because
California did not administer tests last year.
Positive outcomes:
l Student and teacher use of technology for personalization
has increased significantly from last fall to this past
spring. High school teachers who never used technology
in the classroom dropped from 22 to 0 percent; 40
percent of teachers reported using technology to
personalize learning on a weekly basis.
l Map test scores remained flat, but the school system
considers this an accomplishment, given the burden of
switching to the new common-core standards and the
concern that scores would drop as a result.
l
Last summer, more than 200 teachers participated in
professional development, and more than 90 percent of
them rated that training as effective or highly effective.
l Coaches have been helpful in making sure that the
pedagogy teachers are learning is actually being
implemented and in providing teachers with a highly
skilled coach they can go to for support.
Challenges:
l Finding the time to implement changes. School structures
are still rooted in the past, and change happens slowly.
New Haven Unified School District
Union City, Calif.
Enrollment: 12,700
Racial/ethnic profile: 37 percent Hispanic, 23
percent Asian, 20 percent Filipino, 8 percent
African-American, 7 percent white, and 3
percent Pacific Islander
Students qualifying for free and reduced-price
meals: 46 percent
RACE TO THE TOP AWARD: $29.4 MILLION
Personalized learning goals:
l Ensure that students acquire critical literacy and
mathematics skills while emphasizing real world
applications of those skills.
l Align instructional units with the Common Core
State Standards, and provide extensive professional
development in classroom practices that give students
the skills to analyze texts, make key connections, build
knowledge, and think and communicate about the
reading and analytical process.
l Use data systems that will inform teachers and
principals about how they can improve instruction and
learning, and give teachers the tools and support to use
these systems effectively
l Use 21st century hardware, software, and teaching
methodologies to create an inquiry-based, studentcentered
learning environment
Technology-based approaches:
l Established a technology committee, with representatives
across the district; the committee included students and
parents.
l Selected Chromebooks for its personalized learning plans,
but not as part of a 1-to-1 computing project; iPads were
cost-prohibitive. Rollout of Chromebooks was intended
to occur over three years; now in the second year, every
student in grades 6-12 has a device.
l Teachers who received laptop carts in the first phase
had to agree to undergo PD in the summer, collaborate
throughout the process, and then help out with the
second rollout of Chromebooks the following year.
l Two students per every computing device in grades 3-5.
l Asked library staff to become library media technicians;
they take responsibility for all the technology integration
at the individual sites.
l Allowed teachers to experiment with using a number of
open-education resources, in addition to commercially
produced lessons.
l Established after-school intervention using instruction/
assessment e-learning software for students in need of
extra help.
l Overwhelming to the system, putting an additional
burden on teachers to enact so much change so rapidly.
Future plans:
l The district plans to allocate funds to continue the work
being done.
l Priority will be placed on keeping the coaches, who district
officials believe are critical to sustaining progress.
l
Metropolitan School District of
Warren Township
Indianapolis
Enrollment: 12,100
Racial/ethnic profile: 48 percent AfricanAmerican,
32 percent white, 12 percent
Hispanic, 7 percent multiracial
Students qualifying for free and reduced-price
meals: 72 percent
RACE TO THE TOP AWARD: $28.6 MILLION
Personalized learning goals:
l Institute more rigorous standards and make changes
to the curriculum accordingly, with a focus on English/
language arts and math.
l Integrate new instructional technologies and high-tech
learning environments.
l Recognize that secondary students need alternative
options for earning required graduation credits.
l Build a comprehensive online curriculum that takes
advantage of instructional technologies.
l Professional-development efforts involved 80 P-12
teacher representatives, administrators, department
chairs, and coaches.
l School-based training took place across the school year
to support teachers' and coaches' implementation of
instructional shifts anticipated through more rigorous
standards, effective mathematics practices, and closereading
strategies.
Technology-based approaches:
l pIVOT, the district's newly acquired data dashboard
provider, gives staff access to classroom and
student data in a single, Web-based site to track and
disaggregate student performance across time.
l All preK and kindergarten classrooms have access to
iPads.
l Students in grades 1-12 have individual Chromebooks
(9-12 can take them home), and iPads and Chromebooks
are used in special education classrooms.
l Students have options when selecting their courses to be
in a virtual course through Apex Learning Inc.
l Some teachers utilize the materials from the Apex
curriculum for a more blended learning approach in their
traditional classrooms.
l Dry erase walls and interactive projectors have been
added to 74 high school classrooms, and all three middle
school libraries, now called mediaplexes, have been
renovated to provide high-tech learning environments
and to accommodate highly-collaborative work among
students and teachers.
Measuring success:
l The district uses the Indiana state tests as well as
benchmark assessments aligned to the Indiana College
and Career Ready Standards. These assessments are
administered online every three weeks for English/
language arts and mathematics.
l Teachers create summary forms that inform instruction
by showing which students mastered or did not master
certain standards. Unmet standards are recycled into
future assessments, and teachers are aware they need
to keep working on them.
Positive outcomes:
l Online testing has given the district the ability
to gather performance data and act on it much
more quickly than it could using paper-and-pencil
assessments.
l Reports of higher student engagement in the new
high-tech learning environments.
PAGE S18 >
http://www.edweek.org/go/personalized

Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report

Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - SR1
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - SR2
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S1
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S2
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S3
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S4
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S5
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S6
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S7
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S8
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S9
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S10
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S11
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S12
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S13
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S14
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S15
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S16
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S17
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S18
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S19
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S20
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S21
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S22
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S23
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S24
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S25
Education Week - October 22, 2014 - Special Report - S26
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02282018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02212018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02142018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01242018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01172018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01102018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12132017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11292017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11152017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11012017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10252017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10182017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10112017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10042017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09272017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09202017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09132017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09062017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08302017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08232017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07192017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06212017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06142017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06072017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05312017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05242017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05172017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05102017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04262017specialreport
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04262017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04192017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04052017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03292017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03222017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03012017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02222017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02152017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01252017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01252017specialreport
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01182017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01042017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12142016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12142016v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11162016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11022016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10262016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10192016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10122016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10052016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09282016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09212016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09142016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09072016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08312016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08032016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08032016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01112017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06082016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06022016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06012016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05182016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03232016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03162016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02172016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02102016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01072016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01062016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12022015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09232015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09162015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08262015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08192015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08052015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06102015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06032015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05202015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05062015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04222015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04012015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12032014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09242014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09172014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08272014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08062014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06042014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05212014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05142014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05072014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04162014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04022014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20140313
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12042013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09252013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09182013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08282013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08072013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06122013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06052013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05152013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05082013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04172013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04032013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20130314
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12052012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11072012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10312012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10172012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10102012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10032012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09262012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09192012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120829
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_test
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/diplomascount_2012issue34
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com