Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 18

Fight Looms on Kansas Plan to Fund K-12 Via Block Grants
Legislature on board;
court voices concern
By Andrew Ujifusa
The fight over how much to
spend on Kansas' public schools-
and how that money gets spent-
appears ready to enter the next
stage of a long-running battle, now
that the state legislature has approved
a plan to ditch the state's
K-12 funding formula and replace
it with block grants for districts.
The switch to a block grant system,
created by Kansas Gov. Sam
Brownback, a Republican, could
face a swift challenge from the
legal system, however. A few days
before the plan gained final approval
last week, a panel of state
district court judges said it might
bar the plan from being implemented
because of previous rulings
in a school finance lawsuit that
dates back to 2010.
Proponents of the plan, including
Republican policymakers who
control the state legislature, stress
that the plan to fund districts
through block grants only lasts for
the 2015-16 and 2016-17 school
years, and that this period will give
lawmakers sufficient time to create
a new formula. They also say that
the state's current formula badly
needs to be replaced and is not
producing high levels of student
achievement.
However, critics of the block
grants say that districts will lose
out on funding they would have otherwise
received under the formula,
and that the block grants themselves
will still be subject to the
whims of the state appropriations
process over the next two years.
They say that the K-12 spending
picture is threatened by the state's
ongoing fiscal difficulties.
In the background is a court
case, Gannon v. Kansas, in which
the legal system will ultimately decide
whether the state's funding for
public schools is inadequate.
Ending the Formula
The current formula in Kansas
takes into account districts' enrollment,
student demographics, and
transportation needs. For example,
students designated as "at risk,"
such as those receiving subsidized
meals, are eligible for additional
funds.
Under the new plan, that formula,
and the considerations it
makes for those factors, would disappear.
(As of late last week, the
governor had yet to sign the legislation.)
Instead, for the next two
school years, districts would receive
their funding in block grants
for them to spend on their students
and operations.
BLOGS www.edweek.org/go/blogs
High School Redesign Gets Focus
In Latest Proposed 'i3' Regulations
| POLITICS K-12 | School districts and nonprofits that
want a piece of the new $120 million in the Investing in
Innovation grant program are urged to focus their attention
on high school redesign, under proposed regulations
published in the Federal Register March 17.
Under the proposal, prospective grantees for all three
kinds of i3 grants-scale-up, validation, and development-
are encouraged to pitch projects designed to increase the
number and percentage of students who graduate from
high school ready for postsecondary education and the
workforce.
For example, i3-funded programs could: help schools
implement a rigorous high school curriculum; provide
accelerated learning opportunities or personalized learning;
develop a strong link between high school coursework
and the real working world; improve science and math
education; or reduce the need for remedial coursework at
the college level.
And to ensure that the money goes to low-income
students, grants would be aimed at high schools that are
eligible to operate schoolwide Title I programs, which
means that at least 40 percent of their students are in
poverty.
The proposed new i3 rules closely track with a
spending bill for the U.S. Department of Education that
passed earlier this year and called for the department to
put a new, high-school-oriented spin on i3. The program
was first created under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act, aka the stimulus, in 2009.
The spending bill also cut back the i3 program, from
$141 million in fiscal 2014 to $120 million in fiscal 2015.
And the legislation eliminated a $46 million competitivegrant
program aimed at high school overhaul.
Anyone who wants to comment on the regulations can
do so over the next month, and the feds will consider those
comments before coming up with the final regulations.
18 | EDUCATION WEEK | March 25, 2015 | www.edweek.org
The Obama administration really wants i3 to be part of
its legacy and is trying hard to get the program "authorized"
under a pending rewrite of the No Child Left Behind Act,
the current version of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act. If that happens, i3 would be a permanent
part of the esea and would stand a greater chance of
sticking around for the long haul.
-ALYSON KLEIN
House, Senate Republicans Unveil
Broad Fiscal 2016 Blueprint
| POLITICS K-12 | House and Senate Republicans unveiled
their fiscal year 2016 budgets last week and-spoiler
alert-they look absolutely nothing like the president's.
Both would fund the federal government to the tune of
$493 billion, keeping in place the across-the-board spending
caps, known as the sequester, to which the president's
proposed budget does not adhere. And both would make
even steeper cuts for non-defense discretionary funding
beginning fiscal 2017.
And neither proposal from the House and Senate
budget committees contains much in the way of policy or
funding details when it comes to K-12 education, nor do
they propose agency-by-agency breakdowns for federal
funding levels. Those will have to await the regular
appropriations process.
Even those top-line figures stand in stark contrast to
President Barack Obama's fiscal 2016 request, which
was unveiled in early February. The president's budget
proposed a total of $70.7 billion in discretionary spending
for the U.S. Department of Education, an increase of
$3.6 billion, or a 5.4 percent hike over 2015 levels.
The president's proposed increase for education-and
other domestic programs-was the administration's first
volley with the Republican Congress on an issue that's
officially now dominating budget talks: whether and how
to end the across-the-board-cuts known as "sequestration."
In 2013, Congress brokered a temporary deal to alleviate
the cuts for both military programs and domestic ones, like
education. But that deal expires this coming fall, and then
the cuts kick back in full force.
On March 16, the president addressed the funding
discrepancy ahead of the release of the House budget
proposal. In a meeting with members of the Council of
the Great City Schools, the president emphasized the
significant toll sequester-level spending would have on
early-childhood and K-12 education programs.
"I can tell you that if the budget maintains sequesterlevel
funding, then we would actually be spending less on
pre-K to 12th grade in America's schools in terms of federal
support than we were back in 2000," he said. "The notion
that we would be going backwards instead of forwards in
how we're devoting resources to educating our kids makes
absolutely no sense."
When it comes to education, the House budget proposal
focuses mainly on higher education and, specifically, on
how to restructure the Pell Grant program, which provides
tuition assistance for low- and middle-income students. As
for K-12, the House budget proposal zeroes in on rolling
back the role of the federal government and eliminating
duplicative programs.
The budget notes, for example, that a 2014
Government Accountability Office report found 209
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, or
stem, education programs in 13 federal agencies at a cost
of $3 billion annually.
Whereas the House budget proposal asks each of the
chamber's committees to identify and recommend
$1 billion in funding cuts for programs from fiscal 2016
through fiscal 2025, the Senate's plan only asks the
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee and
the Finance Committee to do so.
However, the Senate plan provides some specificity on
two K-12-related policies. Additional federal dollars could
be directed at programs that protect children from sexual
predators in schools, so long as that additional funding does
not raise new revenue or increase the deficit. The same goes
for programs that improve community health centers.
-LAUREN CAMERA
The plan would largely freeze
basic aid to schools, keeping it at
about the same level, $4.1 billion,
in fiscal 2016 as in the current fiscal
year. However, a Kansas Department
of Education analysis
showed that districts will lose out
on $51 million in state aid they
were expecting under the formula
in fiscal 2016. Districts with rising
enrollments, as well as those with
growing numbers of at-risk students,
could also see reductions in
overall state per-pupil funding.
Flexibility or Uncertainty?
The temporary move to block
grants would ensure that legislators
would have the time to fix a
"horribly complicated" formula that
hasn't led to strong levels of student
achievement, said David Trabert,
the president of the Kansas Policy
Institute, a Wichita-based group
that favors conservative fiscal policies
and free markets.
As an example of the current formula's
ineffectiveness, Mr. Trabert
pointed out that just 36 percent of
white students, who make up the
majority of students in the state's
class of 2014, demonstrated college
readiness on four act subject tests.
(Among all Kansas students in the
class of 2014, 31 percent demonstrated
college readiness on the
act, 5 percentage points above the
national average.) He also said districts
often haven't been the best
stewards of their budgets.
"It really hasn't done anything for
kids," Mr. Trabert said of the state's
school finance system. "We don't
fund students in Kansas. We fund
institutions."
But critics of the block grant
plan, like the Kansas National
Education Association, say that
block grants only provide an illusion
of stability, since the plan is
not attached to the appropriations
process. Opponents say that means
that districts' supposed flexibility
to use block grants won't matter
very much if their funding is drastically
cut even as child poverty in
Kansas increases, which it has in
recent years.
More broadly, the block grant
proposal does nothing to satisfy
previous rulings from state courts
that the state sufficiently fund its
existing formula, said Marcus Baltzell,
a spokesman for the teachers'
union.
"There was nothing wrong with
the old formula as long as it was
properly funded," Mr. Baltzell said.
Legal Fight on the Horizon
The courts, however, could step in
and complicate the fate of the block
grant legislation.
Last year, in a ruling on Gannon
v. Kansas, a suit in which the plaintiffs
alleged in 2010 that the state
was not funding public schools
as required in the Kansas Constitution,
the state supreme court
ruled that Kansas school funding
was inequitable. Legislators responded
by increasing spending
on certain programs targeted to
relatively poor districts, a solution
the state's highest court deemed
satisfactory.
However, the court did not rule
on the question of funding adequacy
in Kansas. It remanded
that question to a state 3rd Judicial
District Court panel. Last
December, that panel ruled that
K-12 spending in the state was, in
fact, inadequate, and said that if
lawmakers increased annual K-12
spending by $548 million, or an
increase in per-student spending
from $3,852 per year to $4,654 per
year, it could be a legally sound fiscal
solution.
Earlier this month, before the
Kansas Senate approved the blockgrant
legislation, that district court
panel announced that it was considering
issuing an order to block that
bill from taking effect.
The state has also been grappling
with large budget deficits-Kansas
faces a $600 million budget deficit
for fiscal 2016, according to estimates
published earlier this year.
As of last month, fiscal 2015 tax
revenues were $37 million below
analysts' estimates published at the
start of the fiscal year.
http://www.edweek.org/go/blogs http://www.edweek.org

Education Week - March 25, 2015

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Education Week - March 25, 2015

Education Week - March 25, 2015
Civics Tests for Diplomas Gain Traction
For Education Next, Views With An Edge
Employers Integral To Career Studies
Experience Seen as Boost For Teachers
Elite Private Schools Tackle Ed Tech
Contents
News in Brief
Report Roundup
Eligibility Rules Fuel Growth Of Indiana’s Voucher Program
States Should Play Role in Fostering Engagement, Report Says
Teacher-Leadership Movement Gets Boost From Ed. Dept.
Blogs of the Week
Nonprofits Link Businesses To Career-Tech Programs
At Beaver Country Day, Investing In Innovation
Special Education Task Force Urges Overhaul for California
Gov. Cuomo’s Budget Sparks Backlash in N.Y.
Fight Looms on Kansas Plan To Fund K-12 Via Block Grants
Blogs of the Week
Why School Policies Need to Be Fine-Tuned
Which ‘Common Core’ Are We Talking About?
What Will Be the Impact of the Assessments?
More Educator Voices on Common-Core Implementation
Overcoming ‘Initiative Fatigue’
Letters
TopSchoolJobs Recruitment Marketplace
Breaking the Code of the Common Core
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Elite Private Schools Tackle Ed Tech
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 2
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Contents
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - News in Brief
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Report Roundup
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Eligibility Rules Fuel Growth Of Indiana’s Voucher Program
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 7
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - States Should Play Role in Fostering Engagement, Report Says
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Teacher-Leadership Movement Gets Boost From Ed. Dept.
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Blogs of the Week
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 11
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Nonprofits Link Businesses To Career-Tech Programs
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 13
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 14
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - At Beaver Country Day, Investing In Innovation
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 16
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Gov. Cuomo’s Budget Sparks Backlash in N.Y.
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Blogs of the Week
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 19
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 20
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 21
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Which ‘Common Core’ Are We Talking About?
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 23
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - More Educator Voices on Common-Core Implementation
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Overcoming ‘Initiative Fatigue’
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Letters
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - TopSchoolJobs Recruitment Marketplace
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 28
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 29
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 30
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - 31
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - Breaking the Code of the Common Core
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - CT1
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - CT2
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - CT3
Education Week - March 25, 2015 - CT4
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06162021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06092021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06022021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04282021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05122021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05052021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04212021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04142021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03312021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03242021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03172021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03102021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03032021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02242021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02172021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02102021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02032021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01202021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01132021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01062021
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12092020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12022020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11252020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11182020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11042020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10282020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10212020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10142020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10072020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09302020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09232020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09162020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09092020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09022020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08262020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08192020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07152020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06172020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06102020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06042020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06032020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05132020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05062020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04292020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04082020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04012020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03252020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03182020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03112020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03042020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02262020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02192020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02122020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02052020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01222020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01152020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01082020
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12112019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12042019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11272019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11132019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11062019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10302019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10232019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10162019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10092019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10022019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09252019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09182019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09112019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09042019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08282019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08212019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07172019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06192019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06122019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06032019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05152019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05082019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05012019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04242019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04172019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04102019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04032019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03202019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03132019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03062019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02272019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02202019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02132019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02062019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01232019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01162019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01092019
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12122018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12052018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11282018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11142018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10312018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10242018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10172018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10102018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10032018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09262018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09192018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09122018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09052018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08292018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08222018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07182018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06202018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06132018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06062018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05302018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05232018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05162018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05092018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05022018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04252018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04182018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04112018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04042018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03212018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02282018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02212018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02142018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02072018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01242018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01172018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01102018
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12132017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11292017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11152017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11012017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10252017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10182017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10112017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10042017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09272017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09202017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09132017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09062017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08302017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08232017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07192017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06212017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06142017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06072017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05312017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05242017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05172017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05102017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04262017specialreport
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04262017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04192017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04052017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03292017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03222017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03012017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02222017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02152017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02082017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01252017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01252017specialreport
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01182017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01042017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12142016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12142016v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11162016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11022016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10262016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10192016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10122016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10052016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09282016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09212016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09142016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09072016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08312016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08032016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08032016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01112017
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06082016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06022016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06012016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05182016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03232016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03162016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02172016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02102016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01072016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01062016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12022015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09232015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09162015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08262015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08192015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08052015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06102015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06032015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05202015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05062015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04222015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04012015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12032014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09242014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09172014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08272014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08062014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06042014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05212014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05142014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05072014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04162014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04022014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20140313
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12042013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09252013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09182013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08282013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08072013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06122013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06052013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05152013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05082013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04172013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04032013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20130314
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12052012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11072012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10312012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10172012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10102012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10032012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09262012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09192012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120829
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_test
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/diplomascount_2012issue34
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com