Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 23

EDUCATION WEEK JUNE 5, 2014
I
Diplomas Count > www.edweek.org/go/dc14
| 23
used measures of student engagement,
one place where they have
failed to take hold is in the accountability
systems proposed by states
under waivers from the federal No
Child Left Behind law. Nearly every
state has received a waiver, but only
a handful, including New Mexico
and South Dakota, have used the opportunity
for additional flexibility to
incorporate student surveys into accountability
measures.
During the American Youth Policy
Forum session, Elaine Allensworth,
the director of the University of Chicago
Consortium on Chicago School
Research, shed light on some of the
difficulties in publicizing and attaching
stakes to surveys. She drew on her
experiences with the Chicago 5 Essentials
Survey, a survey of students and
teachers developed by the consortium
to gauge school effectiveness. Although
used since 1997, the results were not
publicly released until 2009. Consortium
researchers worried the publicity
would lead principals to game the
system by encouraging higher ratings,
thus compromising the survey's validity.
However, Ms. Allensworth concluded
that the publicity instead led to
improvements in the schools. I
Students Rated on 'Grit'
With New Report Cards
KIPP'S CHARACTER
REPORT CARD
By Sarah D. Sparks
Most school report cards contain a component for behavior or character, but the Character
Lab at the University of Pennsylvania is looking for a more comprehensive approach
to measuring and providing feedback on student motivation.
In partnership with the Knowledge Is Power Program charter school network and
four other schools, the lab is completing its second year of field-testing a 24-item "character
growth" report card, measuring eight character domains: zest, grit, interpersonal
and academic self-control, optimism, gratitude, social intelligence, and curiosity.
"They're an end in themselves-it's great to be curious just to be curious, great
to be hopeful just to have hope-but they are also a means to getting these kids
to succeed," said David Levin, a KIPP co-founder.
Led by associate professor of psychology Angela L. Duckworth, the researchers
have found that grit and self-control can predict students' likelihood
of performing well academically, graduating from high school, and
going on to college.
To devise the report card, the researchers surveyed hundreds of secondary
school students about the behaviors associated with the eight domains,
then winnowed the list down to those clearly associated with school. Students
are rated by their teachers on a 1-5 scale.
The Character Lab researchers are using the report cards to track
both how closely the behaviors predict positive school outcomes and
whether students can change their behaviors over time. KIPP and the
other participating schools also see an opportunity to get students
and staff members talking more about boosting internal motivation.
"If schools talk about this stuff at all, very often they'll have a conduct
grade," Mr. Levin said. "When you talk about conduct, you're
really talking about compliance ... When people start to use character
and strengths from the growth card, they start to have a
broader definition of what this means."
It's too early to tell whether the ratings will increase high
school graduation rates, but schools have started to see improvements
in several areas associated with lower dropout
rates, including academic achievement and students' satiswoven
into Newton's Playground were
valid when measured against traditional
indicators.
Gauging Tenacity
Another video game example is
Tenacity, which was developed by the
Games+Learning+Society center at
the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
That game aims to help students regulate
their attention and awareness
by monitoring their own breathing.
Researchers say that skill is a key
building block of learning.
There are barriers to using games
to assess social and emotional skills:
For one, the games themselves are
expensive to build, at least if they're
meant to be engaging to the typical
teenager. There are also questions
about traditional psychometric
concerns: How do educators know if
developers' claims about what their
games can assess are in fact true?
And perhaps most significantly, said
Kurt Squire, an associate professor
at UW-Madison and the director of
Games+Learning+Society, questions
remain about the extent to which the
type of persistence shown in a video
game is relevant in the real world.
"Grit seems to me to be an interaction
between a person, a context, and
a particular task," Mr. Squire wrote
in an email. "There may be limits
in how well a game can measure or
foster a 'generalized grit'-although
there may also be a very clever or
brilliant game designer who can do
just that." I
Data Mining Provides
Clues on Engagement
By Holly Yettick
Ask students if they always try their hardest
in class, and they might say "yes" because
that's what their mother told them to do. Or
maybe if the students are a little older, they
say "never," because they are trying on a
carefree attitude to impress their friends.
Those are just some of the problems that
researchers encounter when they try to
measure engagement by surveying students
about themselves.
Enter educational data mining. Long used
in business settings, the practice is newer to
education. It involves using strings of data
collected during computerized instruction to
identify patterns. Once identified, the patterns
can then be used to improve the instruction
by, for instance, eliminating a scenario in
which students tend to lose interest and stop
playing an educational game. The strategy
can be used to track when and why students
might be off task and to draw broader conclusions
about different aspects of instruction,
including learner engagement.
For instance, for a study that appeared last
year in the peer-reviewed Journal of Educational
Data Mining, Jennifer Sabourin, then
a doctoral student at North Carolina State
University, and her colleagues analyzed data
from "Crystal Island," a computer game that
teaches middle school students about microbiology.
Based on that data, the researchers
were able to tell when students were playing
the game as intended and when they seemed
to be disengaged because they were indulging
in off-task behavior like climbing trees to reach
virtual rooftops. As expected, the researchers
found that students who were frequently off
task learned less.
But the game had another feature that led
to a more unexpected conclusion: Every seven
minutes, a box popped up onscreen asking students
to classify their emotional states. That
led researchers to discover that off-task behavior
seemed to help some students collect themselves
when they got frustrated. After playing
around a bit, their frustration lessened and
they returned to the game.
Tool for Program Evaluation
Besides its use in studying or assessing the
engagement of individual students, data mining
can also be a tool for ongoing program or
course evaluation. In a 2012 article published
in the peer-reviewed journal, Educational
Technology & Society, a research team led by
Jui-Long
Hung, an associate
professor of educational technology
at Boise State University in Idaho,
demonstrated how this might work. The team
combined student learning logs, demographic
data, and end-of-course evaluation surveys to
assess a supplemental, online learning program
for K-12 students. The data included
information from 7,539 students taking 883
courses in the program. The researchers created
an engagement index that assessed how
students interacted with each course that
included the frequency of logins and clicks
and the average number of discussion-board
entries. After combining these results with
other information, such as students' grades,
the researchers found that more-engaged students
got better grades. But in the entry-level
courses, engaged and disengaged students
alike had lower performance, leading researchers
to suggest that these courses might have
"structure, design, and/or support issues."
In their report, Mr. Hung and his co-authors
tout the benefits of combining data mining
with other information to evaluate engagement.
"The result is a much richer and deeper
analysis of student performance and teaching,
as well as of effective course design, than could
ever be accomplished with survey data or behavior
mining alone," they write. I
faction with the school.
"By helping kids see a broader definition of who they
are as people," Mr. Levin said, "we are hoping it helps
them become increasingly able to find their own sources
of motivation." I
At KIPP and other schools, teachers
are measuring student progress in
developing zest, grit, self-control,
and other skills and qualities.
ZEST
* Actively participates
* Shows enthusiasm
* Invigorates others
GRIT
* Finishes whatever he or she begins
* Tries very hard even after experiencing failure
* Works independently with focus
SELF-CONTROL-SCHOOL WORK
* Comes to class prepared
* Pays attention and resists distractions
* Remembers and follows directions
* Gets to work right away rather than procrastinating
SELF-CONTROL-INTERPERSONAL
* Remains calm even when criticized or otherwise provoked
* Allows others to speak without interruption
* Is polite to adults and peers
* Keeps temper in check
SOURCE: Knowledge Is Power Program

Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014

Table of Contents
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - Cover1
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - Cover2
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - Table of Contents
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 4
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 5
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 6
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 7
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 8
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 9
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 10
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 11
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 12
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 13
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 14
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 15
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 16
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 17
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 18
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 19
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 20
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 21
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 22
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 23
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 24
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 25
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - 26
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - Cover3
Diplomas Count - June 5, 2014 - Cover4
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06082016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06012016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06022016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05182016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05112016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03302016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03232016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03162016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03092016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02242016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02172016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02102016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01272016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01202016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01132016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01072016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01062016
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12022015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_09302015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09232015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09162015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09092015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08262015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08192015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08052015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06102015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_06112015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06032015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05202015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05132015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05062015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04222015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04152015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04012015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02252015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02182015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02042015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01282015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_01212015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01142015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01082015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01072015
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12032014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10012014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09242014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09172014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09102014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08272014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08202014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08062014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06112014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06042014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05212014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05142014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05072014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04232014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04162014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04022014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20140313
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03122014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02262014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02192014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02052014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01292014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01222014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01152014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01092014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01082014
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12042013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10022013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09252013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09182013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09112013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08282013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08212013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08072013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_07102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06122013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/dc_06062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_06052013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05222013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05152013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_05082013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04242013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04172013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_04032013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03132013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/tc_20130314
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_03062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02272013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02202013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02062013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01302013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01232013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01162013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/qc_01102013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_01092013
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_12052012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11142012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_11072012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10312012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10242012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10172012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10102012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_10032012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09262012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09192012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_09122012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_08222012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120829
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_sr_08292012
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822_v2
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_20120822
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_test
http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/diplomascount_2012issue34
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com